Thanks Danek!  1 follow up question below...

Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:18:26AM -0700, Kuldip Oberoi wrote:
>
>   
>> Also, do we have nomenclature guidelines for packages, empty package 
>> used to tie together 1 application, empty package to define a software 
>> bundle, etc.?
>>     
>
> Incorporation is the term we've been using, though it may be overloaded,
> depending on how nuanced you need the terminology to be.  I've also been
> using "cluster" when talking about the parallels with svr4 packaging on
> Solaris, but I'd like to stop at some point.
>
>   
Should the IPS package names have a certain format if they are an 
incorporation for 1 application?  Different format for an incorporation 
for a bundle?  (thinking usability here)

/kso


_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to