I must have some strange dependency thing going on. I did modify the 
slim_cluster definition so I could have screwed something up. Let me 
poke at this a bit.

Thanks for your help,
sarah
****

Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>
>
> Danek Duvall wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 04:54:03PM -0600, Sarah Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> When I do a pkg search -s "http://localhost:10013"; /usr/gnu/bin/tar 
>>> I only get:
>>> path pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.85:20080404T163319Z
>>>
>>> Which is correct. I am trying to build the image using my local repo 
>>> so I specified my server with -s.
>>>     
>>
>> Ah, okay.  Sorry, I hadn't picked up on that.
>>
>> So what you could do is simply grep through the manifests in the
>> repository:
>>
>>     grep usr/gnu/bin/tar ..../pkg/*/*
>>
>> and see if any duplicates show up.  It's still possible despite the 
>> search
>> results that it does show up twice in the same package (though I'm 
>> not sure
>> how it would have gotten there) given bug 983.
>>   
> It does show up twice actually...
> grep usr/gnu/bin/tar pkg/*/*
> pkg/SUNWgtar/1.14%2C5.11-0.85%3A20080405T174441Z:link 
> path=usr/gnu/bin/tar target=../../bin/gtar
> pkg/SUNWgtar/1.14%2C5.11-0.85%3A20080405T174441Z:link 
> path=usr/gnu/bin/tar target=../../sfw/bin/gtar
>
> And when I look at this pkg:
>
> # pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED], client release 5.11
> ...
> link path=usr/gnu/bin/tar target=../../bin/gtar
>
>
> And then I have this depend:
> depend fmri=pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=require
> which has this entry after the depend declaration..
>
> link path=usr/gnu/bin/tar target=../../sfw/bin/gtar
>
> So, what does this mean? How did I get two link command with the same 
> entry in this package? I actually rebuilt my repo again, blew away my 
> repo dir, restarted my pkg.depotd server, and saw that nothing was in 
> the local repo.
>
> SUNWcsl doesn't have any gnu stuff in it.
>
> thanks,
> sarah
> ****
>
>
>> Danek
>>
>>   
>
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to