Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-05 02:18]:
>> 787 optional dependencies are required
>> 900 Directory deletion needs to rely less on the kindness of strangers
>> 948 image.get_link_actions() the cause of millions of syscalls during a 
>> fresh install
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~barts/optional-dependencies/
>>
>> I'll add some definitions of preliminary incorporations this weekend;
>> they're just the redistributable packages w/ type=incorporate for now.
>> I'll also add more bug reports; there are several incidental
>> fixes/additions herein but I need to stop typing....
> 
>     *.  (Nit.)  Sentences start with capital letters and "->" is usually
>         represented by the work "to".  (Also, docstrings shouldn't start
>         with a leading space.)
> 

ok

>   modules/actions/depend.py:
> 
>    67.  How do you see this function changing for exclude dependencies?
>         (The leading boolean in the return tuple seems incomplete.)
> 
>   107.  Need an XXX here, I think.  Is your intent to enhance
>       Depend.verify() in a later fix?
> 
I've added to the comment; the code there now verifies incorporations
as simple optional dependencies.  We can restore the full verify when
we can backtrack during plan creation.

>   modules/actions/directory.py:
> 
>   145.  If this line is the reason we added the image plan reference to
>       the image, shouldn't we just make each package plan have a
>       reference back to the containing image plan?
> 

that works too.... I have no strong preference

>   modules/client/image.py:
> 
>  1017.  (Nit.) "do" should be "to".
ok
> 
>  1026.  Could you mark this print with an XXX comment?  I think we'll
>       need a better way to return this information up the call stack.
>
done

>   modules/manifest.py:
> 
>   251.  Do we need this "print l"?
gone...  a missed debugging artifact.
> 
>   publish.py:
> 
>   198.  (Nit.)  Double "of" in comment.
> 
>   client.py:
> 
>   447.  I guess we need Image.list_uninstall()  Not this wad.

yup...

I'll post a updated webrev after I get Danek's comments; this will include
a couple of test cases and incorporations for builds 75, 79, and 86.

- Bart

-- 
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to