Bart Smaalders wrote: > Dan Price wrote: >> On Fri 25 Apr 2008 at 10:37PM, Bart Smaalders wrote: >> >>> 1629 pkg install should respect date stamps when specified >>> 1630 pkg image-update should not continue if it finds itself updating / >>> update clustertools package name to include version >>> add SPROfd package to sunstudioexpress package to fix license issue >>> >> Bart, pointer to the review? >> >> Also, is 1629 really a dup of 1612? It'd be nice if you could >> at least see if the test cases illustrated there are fixed by your >> fix. We really need to develop some test cases next week to cover this >> functionality. >> >> -dp >> >> > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~barts/just-a-few-more-pushes/ > > Yes, I missed your bug and filed my own. I'll mark'em as fixed/dups and > check your test cases. Note that pkg list doen't yet include versions; > it just uses > the stems. > > - Bart > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
Turns out 1612 was a relative, but not a clone of 1629. I've updated the webrev w/ the addition of a fix for both bugs (contents and info both had the same problem) in 1612. http://cr.opensolaris.org/~barts/just-a-few-more-pushes/ - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
