Why would you need this functionality if we implement a way to map files to pkg dependencies?
-j On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:11:36AM +0530, Venky wrote: > (Splitting the thread.) > > > You're talking about a mechanism that explicitly encodes file > > dependencies in the manifest. This is orthogoal to the current > > discussion. > > Okay. So, would it make sense to encode file dependencies in the > manifest? Based on this conversation, I'm assuming the answer is > going to be no, but it would be good to know the reasons (or a link > to the thread if this has been hashed out before). > > As demonstrated, this behaviour is easy enough to simulate using the > existing tools and some extra meta-data. What would be the problem > with adding explicit support for it? > > Venky. > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
