On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:02:31PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > >Ah, that makes sense. What about when A's publisher has no idea what > >"B"s exist (let's say (A)pache)? Will there be a way to say "ALL B's > >that are dependent on [EMAIL PROTECTED] must be upgraded? > > An even more pernicious problem is when A's publisher doesn't know B exists, > and thus has no idea about compatibility problems... > > We're still thinking about these aspects of the problem....
OK. Is this getting tracked somewhere I've missed? Is a bug/RFE worth it? thanks john _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
