Alexander Vlasov wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> Alexander Vlasov wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Currently OpenSolaris contains complete elfsign(1) infrastructure, >>> including tools to sign/verify and keys set; however, lots of elves >>> aren't in fact signed at all. Should it be considered a bug? >>> >> >> Some examples please. >> > My pleasure. > > -bash-3.2# elfsign verify /usr/bin/gnome* 2>&1 | grep 'no signature' | > wc -l > 49 > -bash-3.2# elfsign verify /usr/bin/gnome* 2>&1 | grep 'passed' | wc -l > 11
I'd regard those as bugs, they should be signed. It seems they aren't signed on on SXCE (Nevada) either. Log bugs against Nevada first. >> Also is this in OpenSolaris 2008.05 (and updates) or Solaris Express >> Community Edition ? >> > Quoting my previous mail: > ... Currently OpenSolaris contains ... > > It's OpenSolaris with updates, neither Nevada nor S10. Unfortunately OpenSolaris is too vague a term which is why I asked :-( -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
