> Please change the synopsis (and comment) of 2216 to correctly spell > "existent".
Done. > I disagree with /usr/has/share. I'll side with Carlson here and say that > there's little point in putting a share directory anywhere other than under > /usr. When other folks do it, fine, but there's no need to introduce it > ourselves. I had to go search for Jim's note (behind in my on-discuss reading!) I suppose I agree with you both on this although I still think putting known platform-independent files under a per-directory "share" is a bit cleaner if for no other reasons than documenting the fact they are (supposed to be) platform-independent. Anyway, it's not a big deal to me so I've reverted this back to /usr/has/man. > SUNWlinks should probably simply have version "1.0". Done. dsc _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
