On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:37:20AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > I noticed that the output of "pkg version" from my workspace wasn't what I > expected.
Never mind. I'd completely botched a makefile change. > NOTE: Skipping ELF tests: No module named t_elf > NOTE: Adding > /export/home/dduvall/packaging/pgate/src/tests/../../proto/root_i386/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages > to head of PYTHONPATH > NOTE: Adding > '/export/home/dduvall/packaging/pgate/src/tests/../../proto/root_i386/usr/bin' > to head of PATH > NOTE: Adding > /export/home/dduvall/packaging/pgate/proto/root_i386/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages > to PYTHONPATH > NOTE: Adding > '/export/home/dduvall/packaging/pgate/proto/root_i386/usr/bin' to head of PATH > /usr/bin/python: can't open file > '/export/home/dduvall/packaging/pgate/src/tests/../../proto/root_i386/usr/lib/depot.py': > [Errno 2] No such file or directory > > indicates that it's still trying to use the old proto area. Certainly the > pkgmk invocation is. > > The two warnings are also not so great, and the duplication of the PATH and > PYTHONPATH modifications should also be fixed. That all still holds, but I'm not as worried. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
