Shawn Walker wrote: > 2008/7/3 Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 3 Jul 2008, at 17:10, Danek Duvall wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:03:09PM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote: >>> >>>> If there's any more info I can get you while my system's in this odd >>>> state, please ask. >>> With luck, we won't need it, but could you snapshot your root >>> dataset just >>> in case we can't reproduce the problem? If you decide to reinstall >>> from >>> scratch, that's fine, but until you do, having that snapshot around >>> will be >>> a good fallback. >> >> Done. > > Thanks for doing this. I suspect the problem is due to multiple > authorities and one of the recent changes that (temporarily) fixed > another issue. > > Cheers,
Yup... As soon as I can finish my current wad of changes, I'll tackle removing authority comparisons from the is_successor functions... I also need to get started on the back-tracking image_plan.evaluate code... - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird." _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
