*Message hijacked from indiana-discuss to avoid cross-posting* Shawn Walker wrote: > 2008/7/3 Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Shawn Walker wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/07/2008, Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> I am running OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_91 (2008.05 -> snv_89 -> snv_91). >>>>> Out of curiosity I just ran 'pkg verify'. Interestingly, it is >>>>> complaining[1] about few things. Does it mean that my image is screwed >>>>> up? Is there a way to fix the errors that it complained about? >>>>> >>>>> 1 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061685 >>>> Interesting. Can you try running it again with "pfexec pkg verify"? >>> How did I forget about pfexec! Not much differences[2] with it though. >>> Should I report about this to pkg-discuss? >>> >>> 2 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061746 >> The python bits, considering the specific files affected (IPS, bits >> used by IPS, thus things run as root), smell similar to 6469243. >> Perhaps IPS not preserving the timestamps, causing a recompile (as there)? > > After looking at this further, I agree with Rich. The pyc bits look to > be due to bug 6469243 and can be safely ignored (very likely). > > ips does preserve timestamps afaik, so that shouldn't be the cause. > > As for the "entry not present" and permissions errors, I can't say > what is causing those yet.
Is there a way to reinstall a package that is already installed on the image through pkg? I took a look at pkg(1) man page and I don't get any clue there. Also is there a pkg feature plan to fix verification errors that pkg found? Looks like from most of the error messages that pkg reported, pkg can act upon and fix them. Thanks - Praveen _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
