> > I'm not, but perhaps K is thinking of some lurking problem that's not > > coming to my mind.
No, I misunderstood. I thought Shawn/Tom were talking about creating a separate mechanism for additional metadata in the catalog. If he's just going to use our existing catalog.attrs[] dictionary, then that seems more acceptable. > Here's my mangled version of what Stephen proposed for packages: > repository.id > repository.name > repository.description > repository.icon > repository.logo > repository.maintainer > repository.maintainer_url > repository.feed_window > repository.detailed_url > Does this still look like it should go into the catalog/attrs? It seems > now that it really does belong in something like repository/attrs > instead of catalog/attrs. I don't think so. These are all specific to the respository. If these attributes were shared between the client and the server, then it would make sense to put them in the catalog. However, this seems to just describe the depot. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
