On Tue 30 Sep 2008 at 11:09AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Will the ON version of this file be updated as well? I understand doing
> this now in Indiana only to get the change out sooner for more test
> exposure, but this seems like something that should happen in the ON master
> copy, not just Indiana's copy.
There was agreement, I think, that doing this in Nevada was desirable.
However, there are some roadblocks for Nevada which are not applicable
to OpenSolaris (/usr/bin/smc, potentially the installers, potentially
jumpstart, etc). Some of those are being worked. Some will probably
not be fixed until the affected software is removed. Part of the desire
here is to make a best-effort risk assessment, then go ahead in Indiana
to learn about the unknowns. That should inform the decision making
going forward.
So, to be clear: I am not personally committing to driving this change
into Nevada, but I believe the desire is there in the security group.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
