Yes. This would address the case where two SVR4 packages have been combined into a single IPS package yet are still both depended upon by other SVR4 packages at their installation. Would be convenient for us in simplifying our delivered package set.

thx,  --emk

Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Ed McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-15 23:05]:
  
   Excellent. From looking at the lines in these manifests I'm going to guess
   that we're allowed only one instance of pkg='name', is that right? Any way
   to have one IPS package spoof pkginfo(1) as presenting multiple SVR4
   packages?
    

  Two legacy actions with different SysV package names?

  - Stephen

  
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to