Glynn Foster wrote: > > On 25/10/2008, at 4:26 AM, Dave Miner wrote: > >> jmr wrote: >>> Hi - simple one liner to make sure users are pointed to the right >>> release notes url below after doing a successful Update All in UM: >>> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/ >>> >> >> John, while the page is presently at that URL, it's not what I had >> specified to Glynn and docs, which was $release/$arch(/$build >> optionally) (hence 2008.11/x86) so let's make sure we have the URL >> finalized before you push. Catching up on my mail from earlier this >> week, it appears that Glynn slightly mis-transcribed that in the mail >> to indiana-discuss. > > I figured I'd wait until we actually cut the release before we created > the $build number URL (which will essentially just point at a > non-build number, until there's such a stage where we have build > specific release notes). I still wonder whether $build is actually a > good idea, in particular when we get on to the development releases > ie. is $release going to be 2008.11 or 2009.04 for the dev releases, > and whether that would likely confuse people into thinking they have > something that they don't? > > > Glynn So what URL are we meant to use? I need to put something in the patch.
JR _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
