On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:51:12 -0600 > Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Danek Duvall wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:18:54AM -0800, Brock Pytlik wrote: > > > > > >> Another webrev updating another set of tests as well. > > >> > > >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bpytlik/ips-4422-v3/ > > > > > > Nice bogus hostname. :) I'd shorten it a bit, though, as I think it's a > > > bit long for at least some standards, and if it shows up in any stack > > > traces, it's going to blow the line length. Perhaps "b0g0s1ty"? If you > > > > Darn, I was going to suggest "this-url-not-legal-for-use-in-30-states" :-) > > How about following the RFCs? In this case, see RFC 2606, section > 2. I'd suggestion "hostname.invalid" (dull, boring, obvious.... - all > good things).
Awww, party pooper. :) Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
