Hi Danek, thank you for reply. So if I understood you right, I have to publish my package with higher branch identifier, like this:
eval `pkgsend open [EMAIL PROTECTED],1-0.102` OK, I'll try it. But can you explain me why my image looks like Nevada? Thank you. Regards, JH On T ue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:26:23AM -0800, Jan Hlodan wrote: > >> so now I can see on my localhost repo these packages: >> >> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.101:20081103T134109Z Info Manifest >> * Packaging Date: Mon Nov 3 14:29:21 2008 >> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11:20081103T160753Z Info Manifest * >> Packaging Date: Mon Nov 3 16:09:06 2008 >> >> so I should get image from packages with a newer time stamp (packaging >> date), right? > > No. You get the packages with the higher version. The timestamp is the > least significant portion of the version information. In this case, your > older packages have a branch identifier (0.101) which is greater than the > ones in the newer packages (None), so the older packages are used. > > Danek > -- ####################### Jan Hlodan Prague, Czech Republic [EMAIL PROTECTED] +420776263175 _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
