On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:40:33AM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:27:58AM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: > >>>>I'd hope we don't include the spec files or patches or sources in the > >>>>package itself. I understand the lofty goal here, but I personally > >>>>don't feel it's worth the overhead. > >>>Is it such a huge overhead? > >>For an individual package? No. In aggregate? Yes. > > > >Why are we still arguing this? We've explained that what's needed to > >rebuild from source will be referenced by URL. Or are you objecting > >to that too? > > Unless I missed an email somewhere, Laca was still suggesting including > them in the repository itself: "Note that I'm not suggesting installing > the sources on end user systems, only to include them in the repo."
Ah, 'repository' can refer to two things in this context: IPS and SCM. I'm pretty sure that Laca meant the latter. > And no, if you read my reply I specifically stated that I was expecting > them to be referenced by URL. I can't imagine including the stuff by value -- it's got to be by reference. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
