Brock Pytlik wrote: > Reasons for sticking with existing approach: > Smaller indexes, at least so far. (40M vs 240M on my local system, 272M > vs 4.2G on ipkg as reported by du)
Disk space is really the least of my concerns. > Constant depot memory usage for all searches. Using pylucene makes the > depot grow when searches are done for things like p* (up to 710 size, > 650M rss). I'm quite concerned about this memory usage compared to our current usage. Our current usage is much lower for a build 101 depot because of your change to use a generator-based approach. The rest of what you describe is actually great to hear. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
