On Tue 31 Mar 2009 at 11:24AM, Liane Praza wrote:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Liane Praza <[email protected]> [2009-03-31 18:03]:
> >>I'd like to request a review for
> >> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5505
> >>
> >>The diffs are for build 111, but since that's been sent off I'll wait to
> >>integrate until 111a. I expect the diffs to be identical, so am
> >>requesting review now.
> >>
> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~lianep/pkg-gate/
> >>
> >>It builds, imports, and installs successfully, even with the dependencies
> >>against extras-delivered packages. The package will evolve over time as
> >>we determine either a more minimal subset of packages required, or as new
> >>packages are required, but this is a working start. Comments are
> >>appreciated.
> >
> > Looks fine, although I would probably go with "developer/on-dev" over
> > a fake stock symbol name.
>
> No problem. I'll rename the file to on-dev too.
Sorry-- I may be clueless here-- but shouldn't this package have
a human readable description?
I would suggest maybe something like: developer/opensolaris-osnet-dev
or developer/opensolaris/osnet-dev
-dp
--
Daniel Price, Solaris Kernel Engineering http://blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
