Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 31 Mar 2009 at 11:24AM, Liane Praza wrote:
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Liane Praza <[email protected]> [2009-03-31 18:03]:
I'd like to request a review for
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5505
The diffs are for build 111, but since that's been sent off I'll wait to
integrate until 111a. I expect the diffs to be identical, so am
requesting review now.
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~lianep/pkg-gate/
Looks fine, although I would probably go with "developer/on-dev" over
a fake stock symbol name.
No problem. I'll rename the file to on-dev too.
Sorry-- I may be clueless here-- but shouldn't this package have
a human readable description?
I would suggest maybe something like: developer/opensolaris-osnet-dev
or developer/opensolaris/osnet-dev
I haven't been keeping up with the naming discussions, so I'm bowing to
collective wisdom here. Of your two, developer/opensolaris/osnet-dev
seems slightly more appealing due to finger-friendliness, but I'm good
with whatever follows the planned conventions.
I'll wait a bit longer to hear any other feedback and try to catch up on
the general renaming direction before updating the webrev again.
liane
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
