It is recreated but for the current BE, so everything is fine :)
Michal
Padraig O'Briain wrote:
When we exit PackageManager after doing an Update All, is the cache
recreated on exit?
Padraig
On 04/16/09 16:54, Michal Pryc wrote:
I have updated one thing:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/8186_mixing_pkg_gui_v1
For the update all the cache is removed. Not doing so, will preserve
cache on the cloned BE and in the new BE the PM will have not proper
states for the packages.
The change comparing to the previous webrev is in the file:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/8186_mixing_pkg_gui_v1/src/packagemanager.py.wdiff.html
Line:
2205 + self.__remove_cache()
best
Michal
Padraig O'Briain wrote:
I now understand how it works.
Looks good to me.
Padraig
On 04/16/09 16:19, Michal Pryc wrote:
Padraig,
All but line:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/8186_mixing_pkg_gui/src/packagemanager.py.wdiff.html
2136 + self.api_o.img.clear_pkg_state()
Which is also needed for 8186 as the states of the packages when
doing reload were wrong.
Michal
Padraig O'Briain wrote:
Michal,
Which of the changes fix the test case in bug 8186?
What other problems are you fixing?
Padraig
On 04/16/09 15:09, Michal Pryc wrote:
Hello,
The webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/8186_mixing_pkg_gui/
Fixes bug:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8186
The idea is to compare the timestamp of the installed folder on
startup of the PM and before running install/remove option. If
this is different it means that other application modified image
and most likely the cache is out of date. Also pressing the reload
is blowing out the cache.
Removing cache is simply by dumping the info cache file (without
data models) with timestamp set to None, which means that this
cache is out of date.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
