On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:13:43PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> johan...@sun.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:36:50PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
>>> Utilities like curl, wget, etc. tend to support a --insecure option,
>>> which basically says, yeah, I know that I can't validate that a server
>>> is what it claims to be, but go ahead anyway.
>>>
>>> Do you anticipate having such an option exposed?  Would you envision
>>> that being command line?  Or stored per-repository?
>>
>> I'd prefer not to have that option exposed.  Right now, I have a
>> workaround in place that disables CA verification if the directory that
>> contains the CA certs isn't present.  If we'd like to continue to have
>> this behavior, it should probably be an image property or a
>> per-repository config option.
>
> I'm not certain that I'm comfortable with a behaviour that automatically  
> stops verifying the identity of a server because a directory isn't  
> present.

As opposed to the current behavior today, where we don't ever verify the
CA certificate?  This is a workaround until we're consistently
delivering a set of CA certificates in a well-known location.  Once that
has been accomplished, we could set this as a per-repository property if
we really want to allow the customer to disable peer verification,
although I'd prefer to have it always enabled.

-j
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to