* Danek Duvall <[email protected]> [2009-06-11 18:22]: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:19:38PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > > > Danek Duvall wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:11:56PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: > >> > >>> A publisher's identifying name is a forward or reverse domain name > >> > >> Can we just settle on one or the other of forward and reverse? Otherwise > >> we're going to get a mishmash of stuff and it's not going to sort very > >> well. My choice would be for forward, at least for publisher names. (I > >> think I still like reverse for attribute names.) > > > > I just took this from sch's original proposal, so whichever one we choose > > is fine. However, I don't know how we can actually enforce this. > > We can't; I just don't want to endorse both.
For publishers, forward. - Stephen -- [email protected] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
