Hi Michal,

Thanks to updating the webrev. The tests look good to me. And the test framework is clear and powerful.

As we talked on the phone, if the logging mechanism is implemented in the GUI tests, it would be helpful for checking the test results.

Thanks,
Conny


Michal Pryc wrote:

Dan,
Thanks for those comments it really make sense to drop the whole thing we had and simple use unittests. I have prepared very simple test case and I would like to hear if this is what you wanted?

http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/automated_tests_2_jul/

This is one very simple test case to start and stop PM using unittest & LDTP. Please note that second webrev for building LDTP is needed if you don't have it already.

To run this test:
./run.py -o TestPkgGuiStart*


Hi,
I am presenting new webrev, which includes two additional tests:
- sample package install
- sample package removal

Also I have adjusted the baseline for those tests.

http://cr.opensolaris.org/~migi/automated_tests_6_jul_v1

The test case itself was written by Conny (CC-ed), so now we don't use wait(SEC). The wait for certain amount of time was replaced by simple while loop in which we are waiting for button to appear and sleeping for 0.1 seconds if it is not yet there. This is due to lack of waitforbutton function in the LDTP, but it's far more reliable then the initial wait 30sec.



_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to