On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:49:38PM -0400, Dave Miner wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:25:02AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:34:22PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: >>> >>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dduvall/pkg-bug10630/ >>>> >>>> I'll probably update this webrev tomorrow with a test case, too. >>> So updated. >> >> And updated once more with a new message that illuminates what BE the >> rem_drv should be performed on. >> >> Jan had the suggestion that we could look at the original driver_aliases >> file we ship (i.e., pull it from the download cache), and assume that any >> conflicts we have with aliases registered there can be overridden silently, >> while other conflicts can be assumed to be there because of an explicit >> user action, or from an third-party SVr4 package. >> > > Keep in mind that it's not entirely uncommon to turn on the cache > flushing (laptops especially), so it seems somewhat questionable how > effective this could be.
That seems like a poor choice for laptop users. They have a slow disk to begin with. Flushing the cache would just add time to their installs. This should get better once Brock finishes his file cache layout investigation, though. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
