* Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> [2009-08-24 12:24]:
> Yeah, but you'll be able to avoid using pfexec, so you could say we're
> down to just two: verexec and isaexec.  Either way, why not combine
> them into one "special" program?

  As mentioned in the post, verexec(1) will probably have to support
  ISA-based dispatch.  Of our expected use cases, the only interpreter
  that might use this facility would be Python, although there's a
  link-based approach to handle ISA selection already in place.  (See
  "/usr/bin/isapython*" and "/usr/bin/python*".)

  - Stephen

-- 
[email protected]  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to