Bart Smaalders wrote: > Should disabled publishers be made non-sticky, or should we > just leave them alone? I'm now thinking the latter is better > if we're going for least surprise.
You can't add anything from a disabled publisher -- you can't even assume that there's anything listening at the origin or any mirrors. That sounds like it has to be non-sticky. Though stickiness should be restored when the publisher is re-enabled. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
