Danek Duvall wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Danek Duvall wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-12966-v1/
...
coverage.patch:
- Why is this necessary? Without it, the coverage executable gets
/usr/bin/python2.6 as its interpreter.
How so?
Because typically distutils will replace the line with the path to the
interpreter used to run setup.py. And if I look at $ROOT/usr/bin/coverage,
it already has #!/usr/bin/python2.6, so I don't see why this patch is
necessary.
Ah, that's my mistake then. I had suggested the change to Rich, as I
wasn't aware of the distutils behaviour.
I had seen a spurious warning while I was running the test suite and
assumed it was related to this shebang line, but I didn't verify that.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
