Danek Duvall wrote:
Stephen Hahn wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-12419-v1/
So, either the original author got this backwards (which you've fixed),
or we need to make both lists canonical. Do we know which we need?
It'd be good to have a writeup in the bug of why this happened. It's a bad
interaction between my original code and Pete's fix for 9568. The verify
code was unchanged in that changeset, but the way we pulled the bits off
disk did. But the specifics of the interaction aren't something I've
tracked down, so I can't say more than that.
Looking into this it would appear my testing for the 9568 was not
complete as it should have been (looks like I missed the pkg verify
testing).
Having said that I think that both lists need to be canonical as it
is possible for the device_policy to have the minor spec (ie the '*')
and the manifest to have it as well (the SUNWpcelx has this).
The underlying fix for 9568 was to put in a minor spec '*' so that
the calls to rem_drv would work when updating the image.
Does this help ?
Pete
Rich, please be sure that test_driver_policy_removal continues to pass with
your fix.
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
