On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:12 +0000, Chris Ridd wrote: > On 15 Dec 2009, at 21:37, Bart Smaalders wrote: > > > Chris Ridd wrote: > >> I just tried image updating my 128a box to 129. I did have some problems > >> after updating to 128a with repos without publisher prefixes (my own repo > >> with my own packages) and with references to both the dev (preferred) and > >> the release repos. > >> I thought I'd fixed those, but it involved renaming repos a bit and then > >> deleting the "bad" ones. "pkg refresh" works OK, but a "pkg image-update" > >> just now printed: > > > > What happens w/ > > > > pkg image-update -nvf > > > > The -f option doesn't check SUNWipkg... we've got a couple of bugs > > in this area, exacerbated by the fact that people are changing > > publishers due to the origin changes in 127. > > $ pfexec pkg publisher > PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI > opensolaris.org (preferred) origin online > http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ > canopus origin online http://localhost/ > extra origin online > https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/extra/ > $ pfexec pkg image-update -nvf > Solver: [ Variables: 1861 Clauses: 13722 Iterations: 3 State: Succeeded] > Timings: [phase 1: 7.23429989815, phase 2: 0.186830997467, phase 3: > 13.3667299747, phase 4: 5.79566121101, phase 5: 0.0161428451538] > Package version changes: > pkg://opensolaris-dev/[email protected],5.11-0.128:20091125T015251Z -> > pkg://opensolaris.org/[email protected],5.11-0.129:20091205T092945Z > pkg://opensolaris-dev/[email protected],5.11-0.128:20091125T041132Z -> > pkg://opensolaris.org/[email protected],5.11-0.129:20091205T121918Z > pkg://opensolaris-dev/[email protected],5.11-0.128:20091125T042958Z -> > pkg://opensolaris.org/[email protected],5.11-0.129:20091205T124216Z > pkg://opensolaris-dev/[email protected],5.11-0.128:20091125T011001Z > -> > pkg://opensolaris.org/[email protected],5.11-0.129:20091205T083327Z > [...] > pkg://opensolaris-dev/[email protected],5.11-0.128:20091125T022453Z -> > pkg://opensolaris.org/[email protected],5.11-0.129:20091208T001823Z > [...] > > That looks like it will update the affected packages and change the publisher > name at the same time. Is it safe to do this image-update? >
I had the same issue and an image-update worked fine for me using the -f flag. Erik > Cheers, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
