On 01/20/10 02:36 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Here are some additional comments on the proposed renaming. In general, I think having some guidance of where subcomponent names (eg, "network" or "storage" under "service" or "system") would be helpful here. For example, many of the commands could just go under "command" or under "command/<type>" and it's not clear to me when a subcomponent is being introduced in the proposed schema.
I'm not thrilled with the "command" part of the namespace. Was the reasoning behind that simply to ensure that we avoid conflicts between commands and libraries that have similar/equal names?
-- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
