On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:23:51PM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 01/12/10 06:27 PM, John Beck wrote:
> >jmcp and I were working on the gate machine, pulling our hair out trying
> >to figure out why pkg(1) was behaving differently for us.  Eventually truss
> >gave me a hint that led me to $PWD, which in my case on that machine is
> >/net/MYWSNAME/export/home/jbeck .  Well, guess what?  /net/MYWSNAME/var
> >is shared, and /net/MYWSNAME/var/pkg exists, so pkg just decided that it
> >should use the data stored in the publisher directory thereunder, instead
> >of /var/pkg/publisher on the machine to which I was actually ssh'd into.
> >
> >Now, no offense to this team that has done fantastic and innovative work,
> >but this strikes me as a huge throbbing bug, as it violates the principle
> >of least surprise.  Why would I expect my image to be anything other than
> >whatever is in /var/pkg on the machine on which I am operating?  Now, if
> >I was to supply some argument to tell pkg to look elsewhere, that would
> >be fine, but to do so by default strikes reminds me of a story.  When I
> >was coding zonecfg(1m), I initially wrote a certain interface in a way
> >that was easy for me to code, but not as usable as it could have been.
> >Dan asked why, and I explained, then he observed that I would have to
> >write the code once, but our users would have to execute it thousands
> >of times.  Feeling silly, I went and rewrote it, and learned a valuable
> >lesson, one that I think could be applied here: my perception is that
> >the needs of the many (end-users) should outweigh the needs of the few
> >(pkg developers), and the behavior should be changed to conform to the
> >principle of least surprise.
> 
> Are there any objections to changing this behaviour as John indicated?
> 
> If not, I'll be filing a bug to change this behaviour for post-release.

As long as the client still respects PKG_IMAGE in the environment, then
I have no objection.

-j
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to