* Shawn Walker <[email protected]> [2010-05-18 18:19]:
> On 05/18/10 06:00 PM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Shawn Walker<[email protected]>  [2010-05-18 15:43]:
> >>On 05/18/10 04:57 PM, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >>>   4.  (5.4)  Using a .p5p archive as an origin is... unusual.  I would
> >>>       have expected the .p5p to deliver the origin(s) in the included
> >>>       .p5i files, the content of any packages within the .p5p, and then
> >>>       be safely discarded.  The current writeup suggests I have to
> >>>       carefully manage my .p5p files, which seems dangerous.  Could we
> >>>       get the publisher/.p5p lifecycle envisioned in the document stated
> >>>       more clearly?
> >>
> >>I don't quite understand the concern about having to carefully
> >>manage .p5p files.
> >>
> >>My assumption here was that .p5p files enable the complete offline
> >>delivery of package data and could be aggregated with any already
> >>existing package data for related publisher(s).
> >>
> >>The intent is that the client works identically to what it does
> >>today, and that .p5p files are simply treated as additional package
> >>data sources that exist only for the duration of a transaction.
> >>
> >>Could you expound a bit on your possible concerns here and/or what
> >>you mean by "deliver the origin(s)"?
> >
> >   "Deliver the origin(s)" means that the origin of each publisher in the
> >   .p5p is provided in the corresponding .p5i.
> >
> >   I am thinking about how "pkg fix" is expected to work for content
> >   initially delivered by .p5p.  I know we have disconnected sites as a
> >   key use case, so archiving the .p5p locally is one way to make pkg fix
> >   work.
> 
> A simple compromise for the moment would be to simply cache any
> package data requested from a .p5p archive in the client's download
> cache for now.  That would at least make the .p5p case no worse off
> than the pkg fix for offline or no longer available publisher case.
> I could also add -g support for pkg fix.

  .p5p -> download cache for fix: +1

  pkg fix -g: 0 (low priority)

  Thanks for the other parts of the response as well.

  - Stephen

_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to