On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 06:49:03 +0200, Shawn Walker <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On 06/26/10 09:25 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>>
>> is that really supposed to work ?
>>
>> (btw, I run across this when I wanted to change the URI for the exiting
>> publisher...)
>>
>> jette.batschul./home/batschul.=>  pkg publisher
>> PUBLISHER                             TYPE     STATUS   URI
>> opensolaris.org          (preferred)  origin   online   
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
>>
>> try to change the URI:
>>
>> jette.batschul./home/batschul.=>  pfexec pkg set-publisher -g 
>> http://ipkg.sfbay/dev/ opensolaris.org
>>
>> gave me this:
>>
>> ette.batschul./home/batschul.=>  pkg publisher
>> PUBLISHER                             TYPE     STATUS   URI
>> opensolaris.org          (preferred)  origin   online   
>> http://ipkg.sfbay/dev/
>> opensolaris.org          (preferred)  origin   online   
>> http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
>>
>> this certainly does not look right, no ?
>
> A publisher is simply the identity of a group, organisation, etc. that
> provides packages.
>
> http://ipkg.sfbay/dev/ is an *origin*, or in simpler terms, the location
> of a package repository that provides package data for the
> 'opensolaris.org' publisher.
>
> It is intended that a publisher can have multiple origins.
>
> As such, this is the expected behaviour.

ah, thanks, was just wondering/confused.

I'd assume that no problems would arise from the fact that
in the example above the 1st origion provided packages based on build 142
while the latter provided packages based on build 134 ? 
ie. no possibility to end up with some sort of mix ?

thanks
frankB


_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to