On 09/ 9/10 09:16 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:04:18PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote:
I think I'll add a "pkg set publisher -d darrenr" to my
first-boot-install service..
Maybe I don't understand your problem, but once you've disabled a
publisher it should stay disabled.  In your script, please use --disable
since the -d option isn't documented and is deprecated.  (It will be
removed in a future dev release).

What I'm doing here is using additional publishers to
install extra bits to make the install more "automated"
and require less touching up afterwards. Once the
install has finished, the publishers that provide those
packages are no longer required or relevant.

I'd note that, in general, it seems odd to install packages from a one-off publisher and then remove any source of information that could be used to receive updates to those packages in the future.

Also note, that as Krister mentioned, there's a plan in place to change the client to not allow the removal of publishers with installed packages. However, they can be disabled.

-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to