On 09/16/10 09:32 PM, zhongyuan sun - Sun Microsystems - Beijing China
wrote:
在2010年09月17日的07:58，Shawn Walker写道：
On 09/16/10 03:36 PM, Jack Schwartz wrote:
Hi Shawn.
Thanks for your reply. Further questions follow.
On 09/15/10 03:08 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 09/15/10 02:55 PM, Jack Schwartz wrote:
Hi everyone.
Just curious: is it normal or expected to have a P5I file which has an
empty or missing "origins" list?
Yes.
When processing a P5I file, I'm wondering if it is proper to try the
repo the file came from as a default origin if the "origins" entry is
missing. (Of course it would be an error if the P5I file came from
somewhere other than a repository.)
It doesn't know the repo the file came from, so that would be difficult.
If you're talking about the .p5i links in the web interface, the issue
is that the administrator hasn't configured their repository correctly.
So are you saying that the "Yes" above is in-general, but P5I files from
repositories should have a non-blank origins list?
The origins list being empty is fine as long as the the target image the
.p5i is being used with already knows about the related publisher and
repository.
What if the .P5i file come from somewhere other than a repository?
Then you can't use it if it doesn't contain origin information and the
publisher is unknown.
Sorry maybe this is a general question, If I got a .P5I file from a url
and the origins is empty, then I could check this url as its repository.
But how can I check whether this url is a valid repository?
Try to set-publisher with it probably is not a good solution.
That is your only solution. If the target origin isn't a valid
repository, then the operation will fail.
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
