On Fri 28 Jan 2011 at 11:59AM, Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Fri 28 Jan 2011 at 09:49AM, Danek Duvall wrote: > > Mike Gerdts wrote: > > > > > My change definitely should not go into 158 - it would break things > > > badly. > > > > > > If ON and pkg are out of sync, ipkg zones will be broken. I will have a > > > build from my workspace available that people can update from if needed. > > > This scenario is covered in the flag day message I intend to send out. > > > From my perspective (limited as it is) I think the flag day message and > > > a repo from which the ipkg brand can be updated is sufficient. I'm > > > pretty new here, so I need to get a second opinion from others. > > > > If you're providing a repo for those using nightly ON builds to cover the > > flag-day, then it'll probably be simpler for David and RE if we held off on > > pushing your changes until after the gate opens up again for changes bound > > for 159. > > That shouldn't be a problem on my end. I'll pester folks on the zones > team to be sure they agree.
My RTI advocate (johnlev) is on board with this approach, so we will target a putback with the gate opens again next week. Do you know what day that is likely to be? -- Mike Gerdts Solaris Core OS / Zones _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
