Enda O'Connor wrote: > the full output was > for dir 'usr/share' with conflicting attributes: > > 1 package delivers 'dir group=bin mode=0755 owner=root path=usr/share': > pkg://ips.homeunix.com/[email protected],5.11:20090605T122650Z > 1 package delivers 'dir path=usr/share': > pkg://solaris/runtime/[email protected],5.11-0.160:20110228T164139Z > 464 packages deliver 'dir group=sys mode=0755 owner=root path=usr/share', > including: > [ ... ] > > To be honest, I found this misleading, as it implied somehow that > java package was also problematic.
Yup. There was a bug (17895) in the messaging that implicated packages delivering a directory only implicitly. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
