Daniel Baumann ha scritto: > Norbert Tretkowski wrote: >> I don't know if there is a way to provide precompiled modules with dkms, >> hence CCing the dkms maintainers. >> >> If not, the bug should be reassigned to dkms. > > there's none. and the way to build binary-modules packages is through
Yes, there is, copying the Ben's answer in case you didn't read it: Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> If not, the bug should be reassigned to dkms. >> there's none. > [...] > > Yes there is: build for the target kernel versions and then run "dkms > mktarball" or indeed "dkms mkdeb". > > Ben. Anyway there is no reason to drop support for m-a. Dkms only needs a dkms.conf and a couple of lines in postinst, and yes I agree, using dkms *and* m-a/k-p/l-m-e in a module source package is *not* mutually exclusive. Cheers, Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-dkms-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-dkms-maint
