Cute indeed :-). Figure 1 is pretty scary, especially if we replace
"number of classifiers" with "number of features". Of course the
assumption is that classifiers (or features) are independent. But still...
Best,
E.
On 04/07/2011 03:17 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Thank you Emanuele,
This is a really cute paper and possibly method (data will show).
I will look into implementing whenever get a chance.
Cheers,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011, Emanuele Olivetti wrote:
Sorry for the late response to this thread but you might find this
interesting:
On the chance accuracies of large collections of classifiers
Palatucci et al., ICML 2008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1390156.1390250
_______________________________________________
Pkg-ExpPsy-PyMVPA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-exppsy-pymvpa
