On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Generally, I’d prefer to see these things happening upstream first, and do you mean Xglamo? is there much of upstream atm?
as for qwo -- I just sent a question upstream... if he says 'nah' I will
reconsider again and might still patch Debian's version of qwo... I am
ok to carry that one around if I see that qwo indeed works fine with
transparency.
so far both fbdev and Xglamo showed instabilities while I played with
transparency and qwo
as for illume -- unfortunately there is yet no patch to accomplish the
mission, hence nothing for upstream to adopt. Therefore I was asking if
someone would take the burden to create a patch ;)
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-1412 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
