[didn’t see your mail went to the list as well, so here is my reply on the list]
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 21:07 +0000 schrieb Per Andersson: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > > The current installer (our shell script at > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-fso/files.git;a=blob;f=install.sh;h=3129466b5af432b93d60f445600eb8ced4a6ee75;hb=master > > ) has some disabled code to configure uBoot with the uboot-envtools (or > > a perl script that tries to do the same). I experienced uboot > > environment corruption when trying it, so if you want to have a look at > > that and may be get that to work, that would be great :-) > > I will check it out. > > Maybe some other thread discusses this already, > but why don't you use d-i for installation? Simplicity. We wanted to get started as fast as possible. But given the ever increasing complexity of install.sh, this should be the goal, yet. > Could porting d-i to GTA02 (and GTA01 but I don't > have one of those) be worth doing as a GSoC project? Quite possible – please raise that idea on the pkg-fso-maint list. Some others have expressed interested in trying to port d-i to the FreeRunner (Steffen Moeller, IIRC). He’s subscribed to the list. Do you know any d-i knowledgeable person that has a FreeRunner and would be able to mentor this project? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
