Hi, Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 00:35 -0700 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:11:12PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 00:10 -0700 schrieb Vagrant Cascadian: > > > if NODM_X_OPTIONS includes vtN or a display, nodm still passes both to the > > > xinit commandline. it should probably parse NODM_X_OPTIONS and only add > > > missing > > > entries. > > > > this is reasonable. Can you provide a patch? > > parsing NODM_X_OPTIONS in C is a bit over my head.
Ok, no problem.
> a slightly different approach... this simple patch works around the problem by
> simply appending vtN at the end, though has the disadvantage of overriding vt
> if specified in NODM_X_OPTIONS, but at least it allows to specify the DISPLAY,
> which needs to be the first argument.
>
> --- nodm-0.6.orig/nodm.c
> +++ nodm-0.6/nodm.c
> @@ -582,7 +582,7 @@
> if (xoptions[0] == 0)
> snprintf(xoptions1, BUFSIZ, "vt%d", vt_num);
> else
> - snprintf(xoptions1, BUFSIZ, "vt%d %s", vt_num, xoptions);
> + snprintf(xoptions1, BUFSIZ, "%s vt%d", xoptions, vt_num);
>
> setenv("NODM_RUN_SESSION", "1", 1);
> run_and_restart(xinit, opt_session, xoptions1, mst);
>
> though really, optionally having a way so that nodm doesn't add vtN at all
> would be fairly simple, and would still allow for it to be specified through
> NODM_X_OPTIONS.
How about allowing NODM_FIRST_VT to be empty, do disable the
auto-detection and auto option adding completely? Would that suit your
needs?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
[email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
