* Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-18 18:10:27 CET]: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 18:04 schrieb Gerfried Fuchs: > > I wonder - even if it's easy to readd quilt and the likes, should we > > really do this? I mean, add quilt when needed, remove it again when last > > patch is gone just to readd it again when the next patch will come it > > (which quite propable will)? I don't consider the overhead on the > > buildds to be that high if we just leave it in there, is it? I am a bit > > more concerend about removing and adding the same things again and again > > over the times, having places to fumble agaiin and again with certain > > bits... > > > > Just a thought, would like to see the input of others, too. > > Rhonda > > Hm... will quilt/dpatch make problems, if there is no patches directory (as > you can't store empty directories in a .diff.gz)?
Nothing a quick check couldn't help: #v+ $> rm -r debian/patches $> debuild -uc -us [...] $> echo $? 0 $> grep patch ../*.build $ grep patch ../*.build QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt --quiltrc /dev/null pop -a -R || test $? = 2 No patch removed rm -rf .pc debian/stamp-patched QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches quilt --quiltrc /dev/null push -a || test $? = 2 No patches in series touch debian/stamp-patched #v- I would be pretty surprised if dpatch behaves silly in that respect. Rhonda _______________________________________________ Pkg-games-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-games-devel
