On Mon, Apr 10, 2023, at 17:52, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> great to hear from you in this space!
> 
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:36 AM Kevin P. Fleming <ke...@km6g.us> wrote:
>> Package: podman
>> Version: 4.3.1+ds1-5+b1
>> Severity: important
>> 
>> Dear Maintainer,
>> 
>> I am seeing DNS resolution fail when using 'podman build' but succeed when
>> using 'podman run', with a Dockerfile which contains the same commands I run
>> manually in the 'podman run'-launched shell.
>> 
>> Dockerfile
>> ----------
>> FROM alpine:3.10
>> RUN cat /etc/resolv.conf
>> RUN apk add tar
>  
> Unfortunately, I can't reproduce. Please help me to reproduce this issue. 
> Also, maybe upstream has an idea, can you please report this issue at 
> https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/new/choose. In any case, here is 
> the output that I get:
> 
> siretart@x1:/tmp/dnstest$ cat >> Containerfile
> FROM alpine:3.10
> RUN cat /etc/resolv.conf
> RUN apk add tar
> siretart@x1:/tmp/dnstest$ cat Containerfile
> FROM alpine:3.10
> RUN cat /etc/resolv.conf
> RUN apk add tar
> siretart@x1:/tmp/dnstest$ podman build .
> STEP 1/3: FROM alpine:3.10
> Resolved "alpine" as an alias 
> (/etc/containers/registries.conf.d/shortnames.conf)
> Trying to pull docker.io/library/alpine:3.10...
> Getting image source signatures
> Copying blob 396c31837116 done  
> Copying config e7b300aee9 done  
> Writing manifest to image destination
> Storing signatures
> STEP 2/3: RUN cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search int.tauware.de
> nameserver 10.0.2.3
> nameserver 192.168.88.3
> --> 2ce59772eaf
> STEP 3/3: RUN apk add tar
> fetch http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.10/main/x86_64/APKINDEX.tar.gz
> fetch 
> http://dl-cdn.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.10/community/x86_64/APKINDEX.tar.gz
> (1/1) Installing tar (1.32-r1)
> Executing busybox-1.30.1-r5.trigger
> OK: 6 MiB in 15 packages
> COMMIT
> --> 7c1bfd9e030
> 7c1bfd9e030f07b05cc9427a97c0bc5ff73bca5436bce389ad81da1a64f64a11

Confirmed; I can no longer reproduce the problem. Something somewhere in the 
stack got fixed :-)
_______________________________________________
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Reply via email to