It’s updated now. I’ll still look into doing the mass-rename, but for new packages, we can already use the new policy (as I’ve been doing for the last couple of days).
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle < [email protected]> wrote: > This all makes sense to me, at least (less thinking == better). Will > you update http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html soon? > > Cheers, > mwh > > On 10 June 2015 at 21:40, Michael Stapelberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey, > > > > this was discussed a while ago in the #debian-golang IRC channel: > > > > Since Debian Go packages are not used by actual Go developers, but just > for > > specifying dependencies for Debian packages, it might be a better choice > to > > change our naming schema (see > > http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html) for library packages to > > always use the full path, i.e. use > > “golang-github.com-stapelberg-godebiancontrol” instead of > > “golang-godebiancontrol”. > > > > A point that makes this change attractive is not only that humans have an > > easier time finding the Go libraries they are looking for, but also that > it > > significantly simplifies automated tools such as dh-make-golang (which > I’m > > currently working on). > > > > If I don’t hear any objections until this Saturday, I’ll try to come up > with > > a script which does the transition. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Michael > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers > -- Best regards, Michael
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
