On 13 September 2015 at 11:58, Tianon Gravi <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like bugsnag-go has the same problem (and ought to have a > source package rename since the initial version isn't even uploaded > yet, so it's easier to rename now than later). :)
To be more clear: I'm working on renaming the source package now, but would appreciate if you'd clarify the reasoning for the license mismatch. :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
