On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:51:22 AM Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Dmitry, can you please outline what it is that you dislike about the > suggestion?
Too much freedom to upload without notifying those who are responsible for package. Lack of notion that Team upload is a rough equivalent to NMU hence notification is a must as well as delay (through DELAYED queue or other means). Alexandre wants to ensure that everyone can upload everything without talking but team maintenance should be more about communication. For example one might want to upload new upstream release of a package without telling Uploaders. But new release may not be uploaded for reason like when Uploaders (who presumably follow upstream development) are aware of regression or disruptive change in new release and prefer to wait for update. In number of cases upload can be held by known upstream bugs etc. Therefore one who wants to upload must communicate and not just do as (s)he pleased without even sending an email to those who migh be aware of specifics and situation. We are all here to help each other but let's not forget about importance of communication. -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. -- H. L. Mencken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers