On Thursday, 14 April 2016 10:38:15 PM AEST Daniel Stender wrote: > I have an idea but wanted to poll, how could get they both in the best way? Not sure for "best way" but here some ideas how this problem could be addressed:
Sometimes one dependency required only by tests. In such case it may be safe
to disable corresponding tests in order to break/remove circular dependency.
Since Packer appears to be a bigger package it is likely that you are
packaging "winrmcp" merely to satisfy dependency of Packer. There are two
options:
* To keep bundled/vendored version of "winrmcp" in Packer and do not package
"winrmcp" separately;
* To keep bundled/vendored portion of Packer code in "winrmcp".
I would investigate those options in given order. Whatever you choose please
remember to leave a note explaining your decision in README.source.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
For a creative writer possession of the 'truth' is less important than
emotional sincerity.
-- George Orwell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
